| |

Cosmic Watergate?
The following article was published by Space.com, 16th November
2005.
X Files Opened: The National Security Agency's
UFO Investigations Unearthed
By Leonard David (Senior Space Writer)
There is one question that persistently circles the community
of Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) true-believers: If the government
has nothing to hide, UFO fans often ask, then why is it keeping
so many UFO records under lock and key?
“Well, it turns out that the government does have something
to hide, but it has nothing to do with extraterrestrials,” said
Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy
at the Federation of American Scientists in Washington, D.C.
A document has surfaced that had been stamped “Top Secret
Umbra”—the codeword for the highest, most sensitive
category of communications intelligence.
The once-classified affidavit was originally filed by the National
Security Agency (NSA) in a 1980 lawsuit to justify the withholding
of records on UFOs. The document is largely declassified—with
certain sections cut out, ostensibly to protect employee names,
and keep NSA technologies, skills, and foreign connections out
of the limelight.
The document—In Camera Affidavit of Eugene F. Yeates: Citizens
Against UFO Secrecy v. National Security Agency, October 9, 1980—was
released in redacted form on November 3 in response to a Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) request from researcher Michael Ravnitzky
and posted on the website of the Federation of American Scientists.
Foreign signals
A read of the document yields insight into how a super-secret
agency like the NSA became caught up in the UFO phenomenon.
Created in November 1952, The National Security Agency/Central
Security Service is America’s cryptologic organization.
It coordinates, directs, and performs highly specialized activities
to protect U.S. government information systems and churns out
foreign signals intelligence information.
Being a high-tech organization, the NSA is a cutting-edge home
for communications and data processing. It is also a center for
foreign language analysis and research within the government.
The just-released 1980 document explains that a total of 239
documents related to UFOs were located in NSA files, with 79
of those documents originating with other government agencies.
One document is an account by an NSA official attending a UFO
symposium. A healthy chunk of these reports were produced between
1958 and 1979.
Deceptive data
The titles of NSA-related UFO documents that are noted in the
declassified document are intriguing, such as UFO Hypothesis
and Survival Questions.
Another title cited is UFO’s and the Intelligence Community
Blind Spot to Surprise or Deceptive Data. In this seven-page,
undated, unofficial draft of a monograph authored by an unnamed
NSA employee, the author reportedly points out what he considers
to be “a serious shortcoming” in the NSA’s
communications intelligence (COMINT) interception and reporting
procedures. That is, “the inability to respond correctly
to surprising information or deliberately deceptive data.”
The unidentified author uses the UFO phenomenon to illustrate
his belief that the inability of the U.S. intelligence community
to process this type of unusual data adversely affects U.S. intelligence
gathering capabilities.
Within the pages of the newly-released affidavit—and between
sections of excised copy—it shows NSA intercepted in 1971
communications between two aircraft and a ground controller discussing
a “phenomena” in the sky, as well as radar screen
observations, labeling what was viewed as “unidentifiable” objects.
Other intercepted and decrypted reports of bright lights, luminous
objects, and unidentified aircraft—along with an elongated
ball of fire—scooting through the skies over non-U.S. countries
are noted too.
Intercept operations
The 21-page affidavit makes clear that release of documents for
public scrutiny, for a variety of reasons, “would seriously
damage the ability of the United States to gather this vital
intelligence information.”
Furthermore, how the NSA works with a network of foreign sources,
organizations, and other governments to secure intelligence data
would be adversely affected.
The majority of these records, explained NSA official Eugene
F. Yeates in the 1980 affidavit, were communications intelligence
reports that “are the product of intercept operations directed
against foreign government controlled communications systems
within their territorial boundaries.”
New insight
According to Aftergood, the newly declassified Yeates affidavit
provides new insight into the types of records sought by UFO
researchers that have been withheld by NSA.
“Even with all of the deletions, one can get a sense of
the enormous scale—and the apparent success—of the
worldwide electronic intercept operations conducted by NSA at
the height of the Cold War,” Aftergood told SPACE.com.
“Unfortunately it is not clear from the affidavit how the
withheld documents might have related to UFOs,” Aftergood
said. “There must have been some connection in order for
them to be within the scope of the original FOIA request…but
I have no idea what it was.”
But for those hungry to show a great government conspiracy is
at work and that alien-driven UFOs routinely cruise through our
skies, the just brought to light document won’t help you.
“The affidavit does not discount the UFO phenomenon…it
simply doesn’t address it one way or the other,” Aftergood
concluded.
Click here
to read the NSA affidavit – PDF
Format
 |
CIA Headquarters at Langley, Virginia - are
secret UFO files hidden here?
|
Some facts about the NSA affidavit
The following is a posting on UFO Updates by Stanton
Friedman (17th November, 2005)
I am sorry to inform you that both your 14 Nov. Secrecy News
and Leonard David's article about the NSA affidavit are grossly
misleading. Here are some facts:
1. The affidavit was first released in response to an FOIA request
in about 1981. It was about 75% blacked out. Judge Gerhardt Gesell
who saw none of the NSA's 156 UFO documents, agreed they should
not be released saying that The Public
interest in Disclosure was far outweighed by the threat to national
security should the documents (he saw none) be released. The
Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court, again not seeing
any of the 156 documents.
2. In about 1996, the NSA in response to EO 12958, decided to
release a much less censored (perhaps only 20% though not as
neat as your version)) version of the affidavit,and also released
all 156 NSA UFO documents that had previously been
withheld in their entirety. Unfortunately they were all almost
completed censored, this time with white out so that typically
only one or two lines per page could be read. From conversations
with the NSA FOIA office, I gather they were unhappy with my
showing the heavily redacted version of the affidavit on TV.
It is impossible to believe that the 95+% of the documents dealt
only with sources and methods.
3. In the mid 1980s I filed with the CIA a request for the 23
CIA UFO documents discovered by the NSA in response to Judge
Gesell's order to search. These, of course, could not be released
by the NSA. It took 2 years for the CIA to release 9
documents which were, believe it or not press abstracts of Eastern
European newspaper articles about UFOs which the Soviets had
the day they were released. I appealed their withholding of the
14 CIA UFO documents and after 3 years received portions of 4.
On some pages all but 8 or 10 words were blacked out. On one
page they said deny in toto. Couldn’t find even 8 words
to release... I filed again after 12958 and found no new words
at all.
In short then this is not new news, and, not to mention the 95%+
of the whited out documents, is very misleading. Where is the
text of those? What is being witheld by the CIA?. So, yes, Steven,
there is a cosmic Watergate.
I should point out the 1969 comment by Air Force General Carroll
Bolender that "Reports of UFOs which could affect national
security are made in accordance with JANAP 146 or Air Force Manual
55-11 and are not part of the Blue Book System". The Air
Force has never told the public that they had another channel
besides Project Blue Book.
I think some clarification is in order. If not, please let me
know what is in the other CIA UFO documents and in the 95% +
of the 156 NSA UFO documents.
Most cordially,
Stanton T. Friedman
Nuclear Physicist
www.stantonfriedman.com
I had a Q clearance for 14 years and have been to 20 document
archives.
|
|