|
Susan
Blackmore and Marcus Cox
Department of Psychology
University of the West of England
Bristol
BS16 2JP
Abstract
Twelve ‘alien abductees’ were given the Personal
Philosophy Inventory (including a measure of temporal
lobe lability) and a questionnaire about sleep
experiences. They were compared with twelve matched
controls and a student control group (n=51). No
differences in temporal lobe lability were found
between the groups but the abductees more often
reported sleep paralysis than the controls.
Introduction
According to a recent Roper poll nearly 4 million
Americans have been abducted by aliens (Hopkins,
Jacobs and Westrum, 1992). In fact this figure is
misleading and almost certainly a gross over-estimate
(Blackmore, 1998; Stires, 1993). Nevertheless,
personal accounts of abduction by aliens have
increased since the publication of Hopkins’
books Missing Time (1981) and Intruders (1987), and
Strieber’s Communion (1987).
Over
the years a typical abduction account has emerged (see
e.g. Mack, 1994; Newman & Baumeister, 1996; Schnabel,
1994; Thompson, 1993). Most experiences begin in bed
at night (Spanos, Cross, Dickson and DuBreuil, 1993;
Wright, 1994); more rarely from a car or outdoors. The
abductee experiences an intense blue or white light, a
buzzing or humming sound, anxiety and the sense of an
unexplained presence. He or she is then transported or
"floated" into a craft and may be restrained or
paralysed and subjected to examinations, medical
procedures, or the implantation of a small object in
the nose or elsewhere. The aliens are typically grey,
about four feet high, with a large head and black
almond shaped eyes, though other aliens are
occasionally reported (Wright, 1994). The aliens’
purpose in abducting people varies from benign
warnings of impending ecological catastrophe to a vast
alien breeding program.
Occasionally people claim to be abducted in public,
though there are few examples of independent
corroboration. Physical evidence is extremely rare. A
few ‘implants’ have reportedly been removed from
abductees’ bodies but they usually mysteriously
disappear (Jacobs, 1993), or turn out to be "of normal
biological material" (Mack, 1994) or even dental
amalgam (Blackmore, 1997).
The
abductions may not be physically real but they still
require explanation. There is no evidence that people
who see UFOs are generally suffering from serious
psychopathology (Bloecher, Clamar & Hopkins, 1985;
Parnell, 1988). Parnell and Sprinkle (1990) found that
MMPI scores were in the average range for 140 people
who claimed communication with aliens, and Spanos,
Cross, Dickson and DuBreuil (1993) tested 49 UFO
experiencers and found they actually showed less
psychopathology than a student or a community control
group and higher intelligence than the students.
Bartholomew, Basterfield and Howard (1991) found
characteristics of fantasy proneness in 132 out of 152
contactees but when standard tests were used, no
differences were found in either fantasy proneness or
hypnotizability by Ring and Rosing (1990), Rodeghier,
Goodpastor & Blatterbauer (1991) or Spanos et al
(1993). Zimmer (1984) found that UFO reporters were as
likely as the normal population to be high academic
achievers and showed no more alienation, distress or
maladjustment. However, most of the UFO experiencers
in these studies had simply seen lights in the sky;
some had seen alien creatures but few reported
full-blown abduction experiences. In the only study
specifically of abductees, Powers (1994) assessed
dissociative symptoms in twenty people claiming
abduction. Compared with ‘sightees’ the abductees
reported far more symptoms of dissociation and of
post-traumatic stress. Clearly abductees must be
separated from people who have only seen UFOs in
future studies.
Newman and Baumeister (1996) have provided a
cognitive-motivational explanation of how spurious
memories of abductions are created and maintained. The
motivation is likened to sexual masochism, and
hypnosis serves to elaborate and maintain the false
memories. The role of false memories in abduction
cases has been widely discussed (Clark & Loftus, 1996)
and there is no doubt that complex abduction fantasies
can be created under hypnosis. However, about thirty
per cent of abduction accounts are obtained without
hypnosis (McLeod, Corbisier & Mack, 1996). Another
possibility is that abductions are based on some real
and frightening experience which is then elaborated
(with or without hypnosis) into the culturally
acceptable alien abduction story. Two possible
experiences have been suggested; visions induced by
excessive activation of the temporal lobes, and sleep
paralysis.
Persinger (Persinger and Makarec, 1987; Persinger and
Valliant, 1985) has shown that mystical experiences,
psychic experiences and paranormal beliefs are
associated with unstable temporal lobes, or high
"temporal lobe lability". He has also been able to
induce out-of-body and other experiences by applying
rapidly fluctuating weak magnetic fields across the
temporal lobes of subjects in the laboratory (Persinger,
1995). These include unpleasant vibrations, lights,
floating, flying, out-of-body sensations, sexual
arousal, and a sense of presence (Blackmore, 1994).
Spanos et al found no difference between two groups of
UFO reporters and control groups using the temporal
lobe lability subscale of the PPI (Personal Philosophy
Inventory, Persinger and Makarek, 1987). However,
their ‘UFO non-intense’ group had only seen lights in
the sky. The ‘UFO intense’ group had seen craft close
up or experienced contact with an alien but only two
claimed to have been taken up in a spaceship.
Therefore this study did not adequately test for
temporal lobe lability in abductees.
The
main alternative theory is that abductions are
associated with sleep paralysis. Sleep paralysis is a
common experience in which a person wakes up but
cannot move. It occurs occasionally in about 40% of
the population (Fukuda, Miyasita, Inugami, & Ishihara,
1987; Spanos, McNulty, DuBreuil, Pires & Burgess,
1995; Blackmore, 1998) and more frequently in
narcoleptics (Thorpy, 1990). It is often associated
with a sense of presence, vibrations, lights, and
sensations of being prodded or pulled, as well as
emotions ranging from curiosity to intense fear or
terror. Many cultures have sleep paralysis myths, such
as witch or hag riding in England (Davis, 1996-7), the
Old Hag of Newfoundland (Hufford, 1982), or
Kanashibari in Japan (Fukuda, 1993). Alien abduction
may be our modern sleep paralysis myth.
Spanos et al (1993) pointed out the similarities
between abductions and sleep paralysis. The majority
of their UFO experiences occurred at night and almost
60% of their "intense" UFO reports were sleep related.
Of these experiences nearly a quarter involved
symptoms similar to sleep paralysis. If sleep
paralysis underlies abduction reports we would expect
abductees to be especially prone to the experience.
Further studies of sleep paralysis in abductees are
clearly required.
The
present study investigated temporal lobe lability and
sleep disturbances in a sample of British abductees.
Although people who have seen UFOs are easy to find,
abductees are rare. Our sample is therefore small but,
unlike most previous studies, consists entirely of
people who claim full-blown abductions.
Method
Participants
The
abductees (5 men and 7 women aged 20-69) were
recruited through the This Morning television
programme in which the senior author took part, and
through BUFORA (the British UFO Research Association).
They were sent a covering letter, a consent form and a
questionnaire about their UFO experiences. Some had
had multiple experiences of meeting aliens or being
abducted, and one had also observed UFOs once or twice
a year since he was twelve. Ten of them were convinced
their experiences were physically real. Seven
complained of medical problems, scars or headaches
after the experiences. Half (2 men and 4 women)
reported being abducted from their beds and half (3
men and 3 women) experienced abductions in other
situations. Two independent judges categorised them
into "day-time" and "night-time" abductees from their
descriptions (inter-rater reliability; r = 1.00).
There
were two control groups. The first was matched for age
group, gender and occupational group. The second was a
student control group of 51 undergraduates from the
University of the West of England, Bristol (17 men and
34 women aged 16-46).
Questionnaires
Three
questionnaires were used. Abductees were given a
questionnaire about their abduction experiences,
asking for full descriptions and for details about
when and where the abductions occurred, what the
aliens were like, and any after-effects of the
experience. All participants were given the Personal
Philosophy Inventory (Persinger & Makarec, 1987). This
consists of 140 statements to be answered as true or
false. 52 of these comprise the ‘temporal lobe
lability subscale’. Scores on this subscale were
recorded. A final questionnaire asked about sleep
experiences including sleep patterns and dream recall,
false awakenings, lucid dreams and sleep paralysis.
Results
Mean
scores on the temporal lobe lability scale were
abductees 19.3; matched control 18.3; student control
20.2. A one-way ANOVA shows there are no significant
differences between the groups. The PPI contains an
item directly about alien beliefs "Alien intelligence
is probably responsible for UFOs". As Spanos had
found, there were significantly more believers among
the abductees than the matched controls (Fisher’s
exact test, p = .047) and the student controls (p =
.001).
Differences were found in the sleep pattern
questionnaire. There were three questions about sleep
paralysis (waking paralysed, pressure on the chest and
a sense of presence). The abductees reported all three
experiences significantly more often than the matched
controls (Fisher’s exact test gives p values of 0.006,
0.04, and 0.01) and two of the experiences
significantly more often than the student controls (p
= 0.007, 0.11, and 0.002).
When
reports of sleep paralysis are compared separately for
the day-time and night-time abductees, there are no
significant differences for the day-time group but the
night-time group report sleep paralysis more often
than the matched controls (p = .00005) and more often
than the student controls (p = .00003). The abductees
also reported more sleep disturbances, nightmares and
out-of-body experiences than the student control
group.
Discussion
This
was a very small study, reflecting the fact that
abduction reports are not common and probably far less
so in Britain than in the USA. Also many abductees are
unwilling to be involved in scientific research. Among
the 24 approached, only 12 agreed to take part and
some were scornful of the value of research (Cox,
1995). However, if abduction experiences require a
different explanation from merely seeing UFOs then it
is important to find people who claim full-blown
abduction experiences for future research.
In
spite of the small sample, the results strongly
support the suggestion that alien abductions are
related to sleep paralysis and not to temporal lobe
lability. Temporal lobe lability scores were, if
anything, lower in the abductees than controls, so a
larger sample would have been unlikely to reveal a
positive relationship. On the other hand sleep
paralysis was significantly more often reported in
abductees than either of the control groups,
confirming Spanos et al’s findings, and the idea that
abductions may be a modern form of sleep paralysis
myth. Of course an alternative is that real aliens are
causing the increased sleep paralysis, and abductees’
belief in aliens is well founded. The better we
understand the psychological origins of the experience
the less likely that alternative becomes. We hope that
this study, small as it is, may help contribute to our
understanding of these unusual experiences. |